Yn dangos 391 i 405 o 3127 canlyniadau
Update on the Indicative Sanctions Policy review
In early 2017, the HCPC commenced a review of the Indicative Sanctions Policy to ensure it is up to date, reflects public opinion, and continues to support fair and proportionate decision making. As part of this review we commissioned market research into the public’s views of the Policy and undertook a public consultation.
All hearing related activity, October – December 2018
Quarterly stats update from the HCPTS team.
Deadline for expense claims is approaching
As we approach the end of the financial year, please submit all your outstanding expense claims by Sunday 31 March 2019
Visitors – documentary submissions are becoming electronic only
As part of the changes to our approval process, education providers will make electronic-only documentary submissions from September 2019
Visitors will need to provide pre-visit feedback
Under our revised approval process, visitors will be required to provide feedback in a structured way, noting broad areas of concern, within two weeks of receiving the documentary submission
Travel guidance update – September 2019
A few updates from our Finance Department
Standards in practice: how to report concerns about safety
Taking action when you have concerns is an important part of professional practice, but sometimes it’s difficult to know how to raise concerns appropriately.
Standards in practice: being open when things go wrong
The duty of candour is important for anyone working in health and care, but what does it mean in practice?
When something goes wrong, openness is in everybody’s best interests
Vince Clarke, paramedic and senior lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire, discusses the challenges you may face when something goes wrong
Can I do that? Thinking through your scope of practice
Our guidance says you should use your “professional judgement” to come to decisions about what is and is not within your scope of practice (the limit of your skills, knowledge and experience). But what does this “professional judgement” look like in practice?